Shane, I couldn't find the relevant email traffic. Went back into your proposed text. This could possibly be the relevant language I suppose: "Outside the permitted uses or de-identification, the third party must not collect, retain, or share network interaction identifiers that identify the specific user, computer or device." Is what you get from fingerprinting a "network interaction identifier?" Otherwise all references to "unique identifiers" seem to have been deleted from the DAA proposed text. I understand that it may the DAA's intent to preclude "fingerprinting" when DNT:1 is sent, but just can't find it in your text. Could please tell what text specifically covers this? Thanks, John On Jul 10, 2013, at 3:28 PM, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org> wrote: > Apologies, Shane. I managed to miss that -- or forget it -- in all the traffic today. > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >> John, >> >> As already discussed on the email list, browser fingerprinting is another form of a unique ID so all text related to unique IDs is equally applicable to this form of identification. >> >> - Shane >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: John Simpson [mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:17 PM >> To: Shane Wiley; Marc Groman; Jack Hobaugh; Mike Zaneis >> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org List >> Subject: Browser finger printing? >> >> Colleagues, >> >> Does the DAA proposed text prohibit "browser fingerprinting" if DNT:1 is sent. If so, can you please point me to the relevant portion of text? >> >> Thank you. >> >> John >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 23:06:34 UTC