- From: Alex Fowler <afowler@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:01:08 -0700
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Apologies if this has been documented somewhere in our discussions and I missed it, but I'm seeing more and more claims of the proliferation of DNT:1 online, especially outside the browser context. Can someone point me to a published study or paper that makes this clear and the sources for these signals? For my part, I'm looking into the extent to which DNT may or may not be sent today by specific Firefox add-ons. If we're going to consider this as a factor for which signals are OK and also as a justification for which path we follow, it would be helpful for the basis for this claim to be incontrovertible.
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 19:01:30 UTC