two general change proposals, problems

We have

http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Add_to_Last_Working_Draft

and a 'DAA text' which (as far as I can see) is not on the Wiki at all, but is on the agenda for tomorrow.

Neither give any information as to what about the replacement text is considered an important change, or what's editorial or minor, why the changes are needed, and so on.

I thought we were asked to provide specific change proposals, with reasons, and we are working collaboratively to work through them.  I have (as the mailing list shows) done a first pass for the specific change proposals on the table.

I cannot do that for either of these, and have not tried to do so.  "Replace the entire text with this" is not a change proposal, in my mind, and I am unable to evaluate its merits if they are unexplained.


I find myself in a position where it's hard to comment on or contribute to such an approach, and I find it at odds with what the chairs asked for and our apparent direction.


David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 00:30:07 UTC