- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 08:25:29 +0200
- To: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
Peter, Ideally, the DAA proposal should be broken down into the relevant issues, and put into the wiki. We have 3 more weeks from now, when we assess again whether we should continue or wind down the whole excersise. By putting a choice of baselines on the agenda, we run into the risk of loosing pecious time on discussing the process instead of working on the relevant issues. Rob John Simpson schreef op 2013-07-03 04:00: > I agree with David's analysis. Neither proposal conformed to the > procedures that were set forth. Both should be dismissed and totally > ignored. > > I do not understand why we would discuss the DAA a proposal. > > I would have submitted a total package if that was asked for. > > It was not. > > I try to play by the rules and am extremely disappointed that others > have opted for a choice that undermines the entire process. > > Cheers, > John > > > On Jul 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >> We have >> >> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Add_to_Last_Working_Draft >> >> and a 'DAA text' which (as far as I can see) is not on the Wiki at >> all, but is on the agenda for tomorrow. >> >> Neither give any information as to what about the replacement text is >> considered an important change, or what's editorial or minor, why the >> changes are needed, and so on. >> >> I thought we were asked to provide specific change proposals, with >> reasons, and we are working collaboratively to work through them. I >> have (as the mailing list shows) done a first pass for the specific >> change proposals on the table. >> >> I cannot do that for either of these, and have not tried to do so. >> "Replace the entire text with this" is not a change proposal, in my >> mind, and I am unable to evaluate its merits if they are unexplained. >> >> >> I find myself in a position where it's hard to comment on or >> contribute to such an approach, and I find it at odds with what the >> chairs asked for and our apparent direction. >> >> >> David Singer >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >>
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 06:26:22 UTC