- From: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:57:10 +0000
- To: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>, "'rigo@w3.org'" <rigo@w3.org>
- CC: "'wileys@yahoo-inc.com'" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "'public-tracking@w3.org'" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Rigo, I agree that we still need to define conformity with the spec. This becomes especially relevant if we are to consider an accreditation protocol and registry for valid DNT UAs. I realize that engineers and technologists don't generally like registries, but if we cannot find another technical solution, this may be our best solution. Thanks for your thoughtful reply. Chris On 7/27/13 3:23 PM, "Chris Mejia" <chris.mejia@iab.net> wrote: >A registry is certainly another valid way forward. But many people still >do not understand what claiming conformity really means in DNT. And that >is part of a discussion we still have to have.
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 23:58:22 UTC