W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > July 2013

Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses

From: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:57:10 +0000
To: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>, "'rigo@w3.org'" <rigo@w3.org>
CC: "'wileys@yahoo-inc.com'" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "'public-tracking@w3.org'" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7311AB05D142B6489F20AFA8DDAECAE8E5480827@IAB-NYC-EX1.IAB.local>
Hi Rigo,

I agree that we still need to define conformity with the spec.  This
becomes especially relevant if we are to consider an accreditation
protocol and registry for valid DNT UAs.

I realize that engineers and technologists don't generally like
registries, but if we cannot find another technical solution, this may be
our best solution.

Thanks for your thoughtful reply.


On 7/27/13 3:23 PM, "Chris Mejia" <chris.mejia@iab.net> wrote:

>A registry is certainly another valid way forward. But many people still
>do not understand what claiming conformity really means in DNT. And that
>is part of a discussion we still have to have.
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 23:58:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:17 UTC