- From: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:28:22 -0400
- To: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <BB80627E-D986-49D4-916C-4278ADCDE132@cdt.org>
As I read the (as-amended) DAA proposal, data enrichment would be OK. Third parties can collect PII from a publisher (or otherwise) and then append demographic/other data to that profile. Or they could sync attributes/scores with other ad networks. All that is out of scope, because tracking is limited to retention and use of precise domains/urls. OTOH, I believe that practice would be prohibited under Section 5 of the June draft. Justin Brookman Director, Consumer Privacy Center for Democracy & Technology tel 202.407.8812 justin@cdt.org http://www.cdt.org @JustinBrookman @CenDemTech On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com> wrote: > > Shane, > > How does DNT interact with data exchanges? Are they allowed to enrich the combination of an <ID,scoring>, or is that out of scope because it is not tracking? > > Rob > > > Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Rigo, > > Incorrect - no permitted use is needed as aggregate scoring is "not tracking" in that there is no retention of a user's cross-site browsing history in this case. DNT compliance is removing the linkage between browsing activity and a user/device. > > - Shane > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:22 PM > To: public-tracking@w3.org > Cc: Shane Wiley; Rob van Eijk > Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] > > On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:23:45 Shane Wiley wrote: > Activate the profiling opt-out (available via industry opt-out pages, > AdChoices icon, Chrome "K! > eep My > Opt-Outs", industry persistency tools, > TACO, etc.). > > Opt-outs are great, please use mine! :) So you need a permitted use to ignore the DNT signal and only listen to other opt-outs. But why would you claim compliance to DNT here in the first place? I don't understand the goal of the permitted use here within the DNT concept. > > --Rigo > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 18:28:46 UTC