- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:09:55 +0200
- To: "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 08:45:51 Aleecia M. McDonald wrote: > Succinctly, and down to a boolean: Do we shut down by the end of this > month absent an affirmative group decision to continue? The continuation of this group is formally a decision of the Director. If all participants now decide they want to go home and do something else, they can do so. If the group decides to publish all Working Drafts as W3C Notes and disband, they will record that decision and it will be brought to the attention of the Director. The Director may then come back and try to convince Participants to continue. Tim Berners-Lee is the Director, but you should read "Director" as an abstract construct for a decision making management board within W3C that reacts on requests and suggestions. You're mainly eluding to the fact that Peter said at some point: On 24 July we need an affirmative decision to continue. Otherwise we will stop. As a chair, he can make that suggestion to the Director. But IMHO, there is not that automatic thing put forward by some voices that says: "We need a vote/commitment of a majority to continue, otherwise this will be dissolved... " Because the Group does not have the authority to dissolve itself. This is the right of the Director after advice of the Advisory Committee. In normal operations, the way you know that a Group has exhausted its ability to make progress is when there are no contributions anymore. I don't see that happening here. So its good to re-affirm our commitment to each other, but I do not believe that if we fail to get "consensus to continue" that we will have to dissolve. This is not compatible with bylaws or W3C Process. So maybe, some people may want to drop out of the Group, but you can't materially hinder others to continue. IMHO and from the top of my head. This is NOT a W3C team position as I haven't had the time to get agreement or even review by the Team. --Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 16:10:28 UTC