Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance

On Tuesday 16 July 2013 18:20:45 Nicholas Doty wrote:
> I'm uncertain at this point whether this is actually a proposal about
> UA compliance (are browsers not supposed to remember or sync a list
> of open tabs?) or a requirement on other software (routers,
> cloud-based UAs, operating systems) that sees or sends along an HTTP
> request from tracking, or just a re-statement that Web sites operated
> by companies that produced the user's web browser are third parties
> when in a third-party context. So it's possible we would need a
> separate ISSUE, but for now we can use 205.


this is mainly the fear by small advertisers that browser makers can 
circumvent the limitations by making a search-bar or tool-bar that 
serves the same function as a third party and reports all browsing 
history to a certain entity. (phone home). That's why it is a 
requirement on the browser. Because there are companies in advertisement 
who have their own browser. One can also imagine widgets from certain 
large providers. 


Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 22:44:47 UTC