- From: Ninja Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:34:56 +0200
- To: Yianni Lagos <ylagos@futureofprivacy.org>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Thanks Yianni for the draft. But I do not see how branding and transparency would honor the user's choice to send DNT:1. I disagree to treat third parties, which had contact with the user as a first party before, any other way than purely third parties. They are allowed to use the data previously collected in first party environment only when they have 1) consent (e.g. web-wide exception) or 2) meaningful interaction so thay may act as a first party. Otherwise, the user's choice is not to be tracked and this means not to link this user with the previously collected first party data. Ninja Am 03.07.2013 17:03, schrieb Yianni Lagos: > Hello, > > I drafted the below language for consideration by the group after > discussions with a number of the working group members. > > If a Party receives a network transaction to which a DNT:1 header is > attached, during that network transaction, that Party must not use data > it previously collected while a First Party to customize the experience > of a user while operating as a Third Party, unless that Party’s identity > is transparent to the user. For example, the use of prominent branding > directly on or around the content or advertisement would create > transparency. > > > Thank you, > Yianni > > -- Ninja Marnau mail: NMarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de - http://www.datenschutzzentrum.de Telefon: +49 431/988-1285, Fax +49 431/988-1223 Unabhaengiges Landeszentrum fuer Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein Independent Centre for Privacy Protection Schleswig-Holstein
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:15:24 UTC