Thank you, Heather. On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Heather West <heatherwest@google.com> wrote: > John - both Justin and Peter are out, so we should let them chime in too, but Peter explained the thinking of chairs, editors, and W3C folks here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013Jun/0145.html > > The goal was a streamlined draft to move forward from, given the messy state of the previous draft. Justin and I agreed, as editors, that was a promising approach. > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:56 PM, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org> wrote: > Hi Heather and Justin, > > I wonder if you could please tell the WG what prompted you to decide to accept the "June Draft" aka the "Swire/W3C staff draft" as the Editors' Working draft. > > Any explanation of your reasoning would be most helpful. > > Best regards, > > John M. Simpson > > > > -- > Heather West | Google Policy | heatherwest@google.com | 202-643-6381
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 01:20:07 UTC