- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:20:51 +0200
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 18:21:21 UTC
Shane, How does DNT interact with data exchanges? Are they allowed to enrich the combination of an <ID,scoring>, or is that out of scope because it is not tracking? Rob Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >Rigo, > >Incorrect - no permitted use is needed as aggregate scoring is "not >tracking" in that there is no retention of a user's cross-site browsing >history in this case. DNT compliance is removing the linkage between >browsing activity and a user/device. > >- Shane > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] >Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:22 PM >To: public-tracking@w3.org >Cc: Shane Wiley; Rob van Eijk >Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of >URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] > >On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:23:45 Shane Wiley wrote: >> Activate the profiling opt-out (available via industry opt-out pages, > >> AdChoices icon, Chrome "Keep My Opt-Outs", industry persistency >tools, >> TACO, etc.). > >Opt-outs are great, please use mine! :) So you need a permitted use to >ignore the DNT signal and only listen to other opt-outs. But why would >you claim compliance to DNT here in the first place? I don't understand >the goal of the permitted use here within the DNT concept. > > --Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 18:21:21 UTC