- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:01:08 -0400
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
On 2013-07-18, at 16:48 -0400, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > As you can imagine, "weakest" in this context is highly subjective. Is there a way to bring a more objective guideline to play? The process empowers the chairs to evaluate the views of the group and record the group's decisions based on that evaluation. > Again, in aggregate, the "strongest" objection was AGAINST the "June Draft". That would be your evaluation. Noted.
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 21:01:16 UTC