Re: WED agenda

You are incorrect,  sir. You attempted to answer one of my questions,  but your answer was non  responsive as pointed out to you by several members of the wg. 

But my (and others)  outstanding questions remain. This includes Rob's question.

Thanks.






Cheers,

Alan Chapell



-------- Original message --------
From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> 
Date: 07/22/2013  1:51 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: achapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> 
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org,peter@peterswire.net 
Subject: Re: WED agenda 
 
On 2013-07-22, at 18:13 +0200, achapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote:

> Recognizing that Peter's bandwidth may be short right now,  can you please confirm that time will be allotted on wed to discuss my and others' process questions? 

Alan, I believe that your process questions were answered on the thread and in the explanatory memorandum from Peter.