Saturday, 30 June 2012
- Re: Prototype of Do Not Track Exceptions
- Re: Prototype of Do Not Track Exceptions
- Re: Prototype of Do Not Track Exceptions
Friday, 29 June 2012
- Prototype of Do Not Track Exceptions
- DNT and hearing held yesterday by US Senate Commerce Committee
- RE: DNT and Hearing at the EU Parliament
- DNT and Hearing at the EU Parliament
Thursday, 28 June 2012
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- RE: f2f wrap up & next steps
- RE: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- RE: f2f wrap up & next steps
- RE: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- RE: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- RE: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Re: f2f wrap up & next steps
- Next call: July 11
- f2f wrap up & next steps
Sunday, 24 June 2012
Friday, 22 June 2012
Sunday, 24 June 2012
- Re: definitions
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties
- Re: definitions
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties
- Service Provider Attribute in Response Header
Saturday, 23 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties
- ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties
- Re: definitions
- Re: definitions
Friday, 22 June 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: definitions
- definitions
- potential text on frequency capping
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Thursday, 21 June 2012
- Security permitted use breakout text
- Group 4 - DeBugging
- Re: Draft for breakouts - text
- Draft for breakouts - text
- processor language
- RE: url for adobe.com
- url for adobe.com
- pdf of the google doc
- Slide from DNT WG attached
- Re: Meeting Notes from the
- Re: Meeting Notes from the
- Small group proposal presented by MeMe/Ian
- tracking-ISSUE-156: Add a list of data processors to tracking status [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Working Group Output notes
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-155: Remove the received member from tracking status
- Meeting Notes from the
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Partial Report from the left-corner WG
- tracking-ISSUE-155: Remove the received member from tracking status
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: Letter from Director General R. Madelin, European Commission
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Letter from Director General R. Madelin, European Commission
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: ACTION-185: Draft specific field proposal for optional auditors
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults, and a plea to 'stay the course'
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
- Re: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- Re: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- Re: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- RE: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- Re: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- RE: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- Re: Concern over Non-Normative Text
- Re: Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- Concern over Non-Normative Text
- ISSUE-154: Are First parties allowed to use data (either offline or online) from third parties
- ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them?
- Letter from Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, Federal Trade Commission
- RE: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: ACTION-185: Draft specific field proposal for optional auditors
- Reminder: mailing list for checkin notes
- RE: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- RE: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- RE: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Dial-in for W3C f2f
- Do Not Track as a Contract
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Defaults and compliance
- Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
- Defaults and compliance
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: Call for feedback on hybrid URI/header proposal
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Sunday, 17 June 2012
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Sunday, 17 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults, and a plea to 'stay the course'
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Monday, 18 June 2012
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: False patent claims
- Fwd: consensus and other process clarifications
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: False patent claims
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: UI and scope
- Re: False patent claims
- Re: False patent claims
- False patent claims
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: UI and scope
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
Sunday, 17 June 2012
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: UI and scope
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: UI and scope
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
Saturday, 16 June 2012
- Mod_DNT
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: UI and scope
- Re: UI and scope
- Re: UI and scope
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: UI and scope
- Re: UI and scope
- UI and scope
Friday, 15 June 2012
- RE: Travel from airport to Bellevue
- Travel from airport to Bellevue
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
Thursday, 14 June 2012
Friday, 15 June 2012
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
Thursday, 14 June 2012
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: patent discussions
- patent discussions
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- RE: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Draft Agenda for the Bellevue F2F
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- RE: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- RE: Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)
- RE: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Re: Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- Examples of successful opt-in implementations
- RE: Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: DNT:0
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: DNT:0
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: DNT:0
- RE: DNT:0
- RE: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: DNT:0
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: DNT:0
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: DNT:0
- The Rubber meets the Road - DNT compliance code
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- RE: DNT:0
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- RE: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- ACTION-211 Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal
- Re: Identity providers as first parties
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- DNT:0
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Identity providers as first parties
- agenda: 13 June 1012 call
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: W3C says DNT by Default not compliant
- Draft Agenda for the Bellevue F2F
- Re: Updated Proposal - Outline in preparation for presentation in Seattle
- Re: Updated Proposal - Outline in preparation for presentation in Seattle
- position in preparation for Seattle
- RE: Updated Proposal - Outline in preparation for presentation in Seattle
- Re: Updated Proposal - Outline in preparation for presentation in Seattle
- Updated Proposal - Outline in preparation for presentation in Seattle
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Monday, 11 June 2012
- Registration for upcoming f2f in Bellevue
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a DNT Grand Bargain
- RE: Towards a DNT Grand Bargain
Sunday, 10 June 2012
Friday, 8 June 2012
Saturday, 9 June 2012
Sunday, 10 June 2012
- RE: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- RE: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- RE: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- tracking-ISSUE-152: User Agent Compliance: feedback for out-of-bound consent [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-169 Done
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Saturday, 9 June 2012
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Friday, 8 June 2012
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- RE: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-169 Done
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Thursday, 7 June 2012
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- RE: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: ACTION-169 Done
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-169 Done
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context ISSUE-112
- ACTION-169 Done
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: consent
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Considering browser vendor as a third party
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- tracking-ISSUE-151 (UA-exception-req): User Agent Requirement: Be able to handle an exception request [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Proposed text on ACTION-196: Draft text on whether url shorteners are first or third parties?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- RE: Towards a Grand Compromise
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Re: ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- consent
- Re: Towards a Grand Compromise
- ACTION-174: Write up implication of origin/* exceptions in EU context
- Towards a Grand Compromise
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
Monday, 4 June 2012
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
- agenda: 6 June 2012 call
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
Monday, 4 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- wednesday call
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults, and a plea to 'stay the course'
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- RE: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
Sunday, 3 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- RE: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
Saturday, 2 June 2012
- ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Friday, 1 June 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Saturday, 2 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- RE: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
Friday, 1 June 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Seattle preparations
- RE: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-149: Compliance section for user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]