Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults

Your edits do NOT reflect the text in Aleecia's mail you claim to implement. 
I object to those edits. 


On Monday 04 June 2012 01:37:07 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > I have heard that at least some people seem to think the current
> > TPE spec is unclear about the no-header-by-default protocol
> > requirement, mostly because the same section focuses on intermediaries.
> > I intend to fix that as an editorial concern.  Please feel free
> > to send suggested text to the mailing list.
> I have added text based on Aleecia's original proposal that was
> reviewed in Santa Clara (IIRC), slightly modified to reflect the
> three alternatives (unset, on, off) we agreed upon and to fit
> within the determining/expressing/multiple-mechanisms order of
> the current spec.
> ml
> ....Roy

Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 09:37:40 UTC