- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:45:38 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Roy, On Tuesday 29 May 2012 18:23:19 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > This means you assume that a browser can send DNT;1 into the wild and > > expect that to work. > > No, it doesn't. It means that the response has no impact whatsoever > on whether DNT:1 works or not. In this case, the question is: Which semantics prevail, the header or the response? What is binding the server? The status or the header sent? If the status prevails, no need anymore to send a header, right? If the response has no impact on DNT;1, why send it anyway, we could just spare that entire section as it is meaningless according to you. I think the questions above cannot be answered from the current text of the Specification. Rigo
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 16:46:04 UTC