- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:24:05 -0700
- To: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
- Cc: Kevin Trilli <ktrilli@truste.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I think the last suggestion was simply "audit" and that it consist of an array of links to the audited results (if available) or the auditor (if not). ....Roy On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Nicholas Doty wrote: > Are we ready to add this to the Tracking Status Resource section? > > Also, I thought the suggestion was to have "auditors" rather than "auditor" and then an array of strings of URIs. > > Thanks, > Nick > > On May 24, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Kevin Trilli wrote: > >> For section 5.2.2 Representation, the following addition is suggested for the inclusion of a third party "auditor" element to the tracking resource policy: >> >> An optional member named "Auditor" MAY be provided with a URI of a third party auditor, industry organization, assurance provider or certification authority to indicate the presence of a third party assessment that attests the entity will abide by its tracking policy. >> >> Note: There can be multiple auditors and trusted third parties. >
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 06:24:35 UTC