- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:37 +0200
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Shane, On Friday 01 June 2012 14:14:40 Shane Wiley wrote: > In my opinion this is a key divide in the debate for Permitted Uses vs. > Unlinkability. Unfortunately, your use of the terminology is neither correct nor helpful. The divide between collect-but-do-not-target vs do-not-track was solved in Princeton. I recollect the same as David. The collect-but-do-not-target is US only and was repeatedly rejected by all possible regulators. Can we actually stop playing whack-a-mole? Rigo
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 04:37:37 UTC