Re: ACTION-169 Done

Myself, Sean, and Justin are editors on the compliance doc; there's not a
backlog so much as we try to get feedback or consensus on the text before
we put it in the draft (so the process has been a little different than the
TPE spec).

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote:

> Ok,
>
> I will try to figure out where it fits into the compliance
> specification. Who is editor of the compliance specification
> currently and what is the backlog?
>
> Rigo
>
> On Thursday 07 June 2012 13:35:12 Tom Lowenthal wrote:
> > Agreed. If at all possible, we should try to express what happens
> > on the wire in the TPE and what that means in the TCS.
> >
> > On 06/07/2012 09:37 AM, David Singer wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I don't mind doing the edit, but I rather think that the
> > > definition of what the requirements are for multiple sites to
> > > be considered a single party belongs in the compliance
> > > specification, doesn't it?>
> > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 0:34 , Rigo Wenning wrote:
> > >> Hi Aleecia,
> > >>
> > >> for Action-169
> > >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/16
> > >> 9
> > >>
> > >> I created the text on 4 May:
> > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-
> > >> tracking/2012May/0056.html
> > >>
> > >> There was no opposition to it. So can you set it to Done?
> > >>
> > >> This is now pending inclusion into the Specification. David
> > >> could you upon approval from Aleecia?
> > >>
> > >> Rigo
> > >
> > > David Singer
> > > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>


-- 

Heather West | Google Policy | heatherwest@google.com | 202-643-6381