- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:35:20 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
David, On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:00:54 David Singer wrote: > > Third, while we have documented DNT as being on / off / unset, do we > > want to write that as a requirement for user agents? User interface is > > out of scope by charter, but we could require user agents to offer all > > three options. Currently we only state all three are possible values > > (which we do document well.) > Unless DNT:0 means something other than no DNT, for server behavior, I > think the user only needs to be asked "DNT with that, sir?". DNT:0 is an > artefact of the way that exceptions (user-granted) work, not a third > choice. I hope. I would hope so too. I could imagine a requirement on user agents that they can only be compliant if they can not only spawn headers but also react on the exception mechanism, meaning that a server is able to get an exception. I fear that the anti-virus tools don't do that and just send headers. This is excluding the choice we want to enable. Rigo
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 16:35:55 UTC