- From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:51:54 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>
We already are by discussing elements of a standard no one in industry will implement. You're taking us down that road again... - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:59 PM To: public-tracking@w3.org Cc: Roy T. Fielding; Tamir Israel Subject: Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance On Tuesday 12 June 2012 16:30:21 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > DNT is not the only consent mechanism. Right now it doesn't > even qualify as one. Inside the tracking status resource you > will see a link to a control resource. That resource is a > consent mechanism. It doesn't depend on DNT. It doesn't > disappear even if the DNT field is ignored. And that's just > one of many possible consent mechanisms other than DNT that > a site might use in order to comply with regional laws. You could implement P3P that had already that opt-out URI 10 years ago... Roy, are you suggesting we repeat history? Rigo
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 00:52:41 UTC