Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance

On Friday 08 June 2012 13:59:57 Tamir Israel wrote:
> However, in this context, I'm not clear that where a server
> merely  notifies the user they will ignore their DNT-1 signal,
> that this is sufficient to gain user consent for server tracking.

In case of NACK, it will fall back to the legal default. Which is 
/null in the US and "no opt-in for you service" in many other 
jurisdictions. So from an EU standpoint, ignoring the signal is kind 
of not really beneficial. 

Rigo

Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 18:40:14 UTC