- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:39:40 +0200
- To: Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>
- Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Ninja Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Friday 08 June 2012 13:59:57 Tamir Israel wrote: > However, in this context, I'm not clear that where a server > merely notifies the user they will ignore their DNT-1 signal, > that this is sufficient to gain user consent for server tracking. In case of NACK, it will fall back to the legal default. Which is /null in the US and "no opt-in for you service" in many other jurisdictions. So from an EU standpoint, ignoring the signal is kind of not really beneficial. Rigo
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 18:40:14 UTC