- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:42:27 +0200
- To: Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>
- Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Ninja Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Tamir, On Friday 08 June 2012 14:38:17 Tamir Israel wrote: > I should explain -- contrary to the EU and US frameworks, there is > no clear requirement for opt-in consent under Canadian law in > this context. However, there is a requirement for consent of some > sort. So you do need to get consent, and once the [deemed] > invalid DNT-1 is rejected, there is no longer any way of gaining > that consent. I think for Canada, the question will be if the regulators recognize the default sending of DNT:1 as an expression that is taken into account to determine implicit consent of some sort. Now if a canadian service is unsure about it, they can always trigger an exception call to the user agent. This is nearly the same as sending NACK.
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 18:42:54 UTC