- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 07:17:05 +0200
- To: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>
Kevin, part of your scenario is overcomplicating things language-wise. A third party with an exception receives DNT;0, right? So both third party cases are the same. On Friday 01 June 2012 14:18:04 Kevin Smith wrote: > I do not think we want to introduce another variation of limitations > unless the benefit is huge. The benefit is a working exception system worldwide, even for chains that can't be predicted. IMHO this is huge and the limitations and complications are small. And if you want to do business as usual and add stuff to your profile, get a direct DNT;0 signal, get a web-wide exception for your service or some out of band consent. Rigo
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 05:17:32 UTC