Re: Call for feedback on hybrid URI/header proposal

I remain concerned that the current text doesn't make it easy to determine "does this server think it is allowed to track me, i.e. might it be tracking me if it wishes?"

It currently allows me to determine "is this a 1st party?" which is only one of four cases:
* 1st party
* 3rd party that didn't see a DNT request (maybe it got deleted in transit)
* 3rd party that thinks it saw DNT:0
* 3rd party that thinks it has an out-of-band exception

On May 14, 2012, at 14:23 , Matthias Schunter wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> I'd like to re-emphasize my call for feedback on the URI/header proposal
> (TPE spec; chapter 5).
> The feedback needed (in decreasing order of preference):
> 1. Concrete text proposals enhancing/improving the current draft
> 2. Concrete requirements & use cases that are not met by the current spec
> 3. Other concrete comments on the drafts
> If you do not comment on the current proposal, I will interpret silence
> as agreement ;-)
> If you need more information / explanation, feel free to ping me.
> Regards,
> matthias

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 18:01:00 UTC