- From: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:49:14 -0600
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Interesting. So there's no such thing as a reliable UA and all UA's should be treated as unreliable. Makes one wonder what the purpose of the UA really is? Peter ___________________________________ Peter J. Cranstone 720.663.1752 -----Original Message----- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Date: Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:47 PM To: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com> Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org> Subject: Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties >* Peter Cranstone wrote: >>So how does one determine what exactly is a "reliable UA"? > >There is no such thing for the purposes of Matthias' text. >-- >Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de >Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de >25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2012 01:49:55 UTC