- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:42:20 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Roy, On Friday 01 June 2012 10:56:06 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > If the status prevails, no need anymore to send a header, right? If the > > response has no impact on DNT;1, why send it anyway, we could just > > spare > > that entire section as it is meaningless according to you. > > Yes, that's what I said in response to the first I-D at the Prague IETF. Hm, it is unfortunate that after all the discussions, you're still in Prague. Will you come to Seattle? If a user expresses a preference of DNT;0 and the server is happy to confirm that DNT;0, there are matching expressions of preferences. Matching expressions of preferences can be seen as matching of will on an determined object (the request). Matching expressions of will is the definition of agreement[1], whatever you say, will say or will not accept. Consent is a special case of agreement with the additional requirements that Rob mentioned. 1. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/agreement Rigo
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 19:42:48 UTC