- From: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:24:07 +0200
- To: ifette@google.com
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Ian/Jonathan, this may be a misunderstanding. I interpret Ian's (short) sentence the following way a) A site can choose whether to implement compliance with the DNT spec or not [However, if I understand the US legal system correctly, it must not wrongly claim to have implemented the specs while doing something else] b) We agreed that a standards-compliant site is free how to service DNT;1 customers as long as they satisfy the requirements in our specs. As a consequence, a site may comply by sending all DNT;1 users to a landing page that requires to grant an exception. Whom to send to such landing pages and for what reasons is up to the site to decide. [However, our current approach mandates that this landing page complies with our spec] Jonathan/Ian: Do you agree that my words reflect our current agreements? Feel free to comment. Regards, matthias On 08/06/2012 03:25, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > A site is already under no obligation to conform to DNT.
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2012 23:46:56 UTC