- From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:08:33 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <24AC5703EF4D450CBC7E46F909D3D645@gmail.com>
Rigo, Could you mock up a UI that would, in your view, satisfy EU law? This is difficult to discuss in the abstract. Thanks, Jonathan On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Jonathan, > > for EU consent purposes we need a more detailed list of allowances > (aka "at least") I took an action with Shane, but this is overdue. > So this is just a heads up that I believe we need not only to > release the restrictions from the compliance spec, but also a set of > positive permissions for the ad chains to work in the EU context. > Because otherwise, DNT:0 will not give permissions in regulated > environments (also think about Australia & Japan) > > I presented yesterday at the IAB Europe and there was some interest > in providing further input, hopefully. > > Rigo > > On Wednesday 13 June 2012 10:43:35 Jonathan Mayer wrote: > > Normative: > > > > i. In General > > > > A DNT: 0 exception allows a website to conduct specific practices > > that are otherwise prohibited by this specification. > > > > ii. Explanation Requirement > > > > When a website requests a DNT: 0 exception, it MUST clearly > > explain those practices to the user. > > > > iii. Multiple Semantics > > > > If a website maintains multiple semantics for DNT: 0, it is > > responsible for associating the proper semantic with a user > > agent. If a website cannot determine the semantics associated > > with a DNT: 0 exception, it may not rely on the exception. > > > > Non-Normative Discussion: > > > > i. Legal Implications > > > > This specification does not take a position on whether the DNT: 0 > > exception mechanism is sufficient to satisfy any legal > > requirements. > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 00:09:04 UTC