- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:09 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, ifette@google.com
On Friday 08 June 2012 21:56:02 Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > As for the specific feature you propose above, I see no reason to > have features to make negative conformance claims; it's much > better to infer likely non-conformance from the absence of > positive conformance claims. If usability studies have shown the > mere claim "I ignore DNT signals" is useful to normal users, then > I would suggest to make that a conformance level if people expect > great interest in this on part of site owners. Hear Hear! +1
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 20:09:25 UTC