Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance

On Friday 08 June 2012 21:56:02 Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> As for the specific feature you propose above, I see no reason to
> have features to make negative conformance claims; it's much
> better to infer likely non-conformance from the absence of
> positive conformance claims. If usability studies have shown the
> mere claim "I ignore DNT signals" is useful to normal users, then
> I would suggest to make that a conformance level if people expect
> great interest in this on part of site owners.

Hear Hear!

+1

Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 20:09:25 UTC