- From: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:01:02 -0600
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>
What does the client respond with? Peter ___________________________________ Peter J. Cranstone 720.663.1752 -----Original Message----- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> Organization: W3C Date: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:55 AM To: W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org> Cc: Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org> Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Resent-From: W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org> Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:56:17 +0000 >A conformance section could say >e.g. that servers responding with NACK can claim to be "DNT Protocol >compliant" but not "DNT compliant".
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 15:01:48 UTC