- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:14:18 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
* Roy T. Fielding wrote: >I think you are missing the point. The DNT signals do not matter if >the UA's implementation is broken. A site can choose to do anything >it wants, including denying all service, provided that what it chooses >to do is consistent with other claims it has made to this user. I think I understand the point, but as a site owner I do not want the option to "second-guess" DNT signals, and as a user I do not want any site to "second-guess" DNT signals I might be sending, within the con- fines of "conforms to the DNT specifications", including that I do not want sites to tell me something meaningless like "If you send DNT:1 we won't track you, unless we think you might not really mean 'DNT:1'". My concern here is about "authority". If the DNT specifications say the W3C will publish, say, a list of User-Agent headers that can or must be used to filter out broken signals, I'll not complain. But if individual sites get to decide which DNT signals are broken, then I will complain. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 02:14:41 UTC