Re: ISSUE-4 and clarity regarding browser defaults

Please be specific.


On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Rigo Wenning <> wrote:

> Your edits do NOT reflect the text in Aleecia's mail you claim to implement. 
> I object to those edits. 
> Rigo
> On Monday 04 June 2012 01:37:07 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>> I have heard that at least some people seem to think the current
>>> TPE spec is unclear about the no-header-by-default protocol
>>> requirement, mostly because the same section focuses on intermediaries.
>>> I intend to fix that as an editorial concern.  Please feel free
>>> to send suggested text to the mailing list.
>> I have added text based on Aleecia's original proposal that was
>> reviewed in Santa Clara (IIRC), slightly modified to reflect the
>> three alternatives (unset, on, off) we agreed upon and to fit
>> within the determining/expressing/multiple-mechanisms order of
>> the current spec.
>> ml
>> ....Roy

Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 16:48:54 UTC