Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance

Agreed. HTTP is the ring that binds us all. If DNT is to get any traction it
must adapt to different regions. Location is going to play a very important
role in privacy, getting it on a desktop device is easy, mobile not so much.



Peter
___________________________________
Peter J. Cranstone


Contact information (Email is fastest)
____________________________________
Email:      peter.cranstone@gmail.com <mailto:peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Phone:    (00 +1) 720.663.1752


From:  Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>
Date:  Monday, June 11, 2012 6:13 PM
To:  Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Cc:  Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, <ifette@google.com>, Shane Wiley
<wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Ninja
Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, Bjoern
Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, W3 Tracking
<public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Resent-From:  W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org>
Resent-Date:  Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:15:26 +0000

>     
>  Hi Alan,
>  
>  Would it not be in the interests of all if this standard were able to take
> into account as many regulatory problems for online trackers as possible?
>  
>  Best,
>  Tamir
>  
>  On 6/11/2012 11:41 AM, Alan Chapell wrote:
>> It seems to me that the group is spending a fair amount of time focusing on
>> how DNT will provide a panacea to the legal uncertainty in the EU and now
>> Canada. I'm not sure its a productive road for this group to be going down.
>> DNT is unlikely to be the sole path to compliance in either the EU or Canada.
>  

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 01:57:30 UTC