Agreed. HTTP is the ring that binds us all. If DNT is to get any traction it
must adapt to different regions. Location is going to play a very important
role in privacy, getting it on a desktop device is easy, mobile not so much.
Peter
___________________________________
Peter J. Cranstone
Contact information (Email is fastest)
____________________________________
Email: peter.cranstone@gmail.com <mailto:peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Phone: (00 +1) 720.663.1752
From: Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>
Date: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:13 PM
To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, <ifette@google.com>, Shane Wiley
<wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Ninja
Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, Bjoern
Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, W3 Tracking
<public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Today's call: summary on user agent compliance
Resent-From: W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:15:26 +0000
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Would it not be in the interests of all if this standard were able to take
> into account as many regulatory problems for online trackers as possible?
>
> Best,
> Tamir
>
> On 6/11/2012 11:41 AM, Alan Chapell wrote:
>> It seems to me that the group is spending a fair amount of time focusing on
>> how DNT will provide a panacea to the legal uncertainty in the EU and now
>> Canada. I'm not sure its a productive road for this group to be going down.
>> DNT is unlikely to be the sole path to compliance in either the EU or Canada.
>