Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice

Jason,

Would you care to comment on these suggested changes? (now includes Shane's
fix to 4c)

> Part III Explicit and Separate User Choice
> <Normative>
> 1.     A User Agent must obtain explicit, informed consent to turn on the DNT
> header*
> 
> 2.     The User Agent must also make available via a link in explanatory text
> where DNT is enabled to provide more detailed information about DNT
> functionality
> 
> 3.     Any User Agent claiming compliance must have a functional
> implementation of the browser exceptions in this specification
> 
> 4.     Servers MAY MUST respond to users that their UA is ³non-compliant² if
> they believe this to be the case
> 
> a.     User Agents MUST relay Server responses to users to ensure transparency
> 
> b.     Servers SHOULD MUST be prepared to defend why they have reached this
> conclusion
> 
> c.     ³Servers that respond to all DNT requests as non-compliant regardless
> of User Agent details ARE NOT compliant with this recommendation.²
> 
> d.     Servers MAY MUST offer users additional information through a resource
> link
> 
> 5.     Efforts to misled users to activate Do Not Track MAY also be seen as
> ³non-compliant²
> 
> *NOTE ­ The TPWG already agreed on this point
> 


Peter
___________________________________
Peter J. Cranstone
720.663.1752


From:  Jason Bier <jbier@dotomi.com>
Date:  Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:42 AM
To:  Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc:  W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject:  RE: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
Resent-From:  W3 Tracking <public-tracking@w3.org>
Resent-Date:  Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:45:07 +0000

> I would like to thank Shane for sending this as well and for Mike¹s statement.
> ValueClick also supports the industry proposal.  In the spirit of cooperation
> and advancing interests on this matter, I hope all of us can advance the
> process and find a solution that results in meaningful adoption by a
> significant portion of the online advertising industry.
>  
> Jason
> 
>  
> Jason J. Bier, Esq., CIPP
> Chief Privacy Officer
> ValueClick, Inc.
> o: 312-588-3619
> f: 312-896-7422
>  
> 
> From: Mike Zaneis [mailto:mike@iab.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:55 AM
> To: Shane Wiley
> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
>  
> 
> Thank you for sending this Shane. While there are still some items we would
> like to see in the two documents that might not be reflected in the current
> industry proposal, in the spirit of cooperation and advancing the process IAB
> supports this approach. I look forward to discussing it this week.
> 
> Mike Zaneis 
> 
> SVP & General Counsel, IAB
> 
> (202) 253-1466
> 
> 
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:05 AM, "Shane Wiley" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> 
>> TPWG,
>>  
>> Please find attached the detailed proposal text we¹ll be reviewing tomorrow
>> afternoon (built upon the proposal outline I provided last week).
>>  
>> The following individuals, companies, and trade associations contributed to
>> this proposal:  
>>  
>> Marc Groman & David Wainberg ­ NAI
>> Alan Chapell ­ Chapell & Associates
>> Heather West, Sean Harvey, & Ian Fette ­ Google
>> Shane Wiley ­ Yahoo!
>>  
>> There is considerable detail covering numerous topics in this proposal and
>> therefore it should not be consider an endorsement by all contributors to all
>> parts of this proposal.  That said, all contributors generally agree with the
>> direction and approach of this document.
>>  
>> We look forward to further discussion and fielding questions tomorrow
>> afternoon.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Shane
>> 
>> <Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice - W3C Seattle.docx>
> 
> 
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2433/5080 - Release Date: 06/19/12