www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2003 by author

Aaron Swartz

• concepts doc: 404s aren't meaningful? (Friday, 14 February)

Arjohn Kampman

• Re: Comments on RDF test cases (Friday, 21 March)
• Comments on RDF test cases (Friday, 21 March)
• rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ??? (Thursday, 30 January)
• duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc (Thursday, 30 January)

Art.Barstow@nokia.com

• Vocab serialization equivalences (Monday, 6 January)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Saturday, 22 February)
• RDFS comments (Saturday, 22 February)

Bill Kearney

• Re: other rdf:nodeID name thoughts (Sunday, 19 January)

Bob MacGregor

• Re: [closed] macgregor-01, Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: [new issue] Assertion and provenance (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Friday, 14 February)
• Statings -- Much ado about nothing (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Wednesday, 29 January)
• RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores (Thursday, 9 January)

Brian McBride

• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Issue timbl-03 Collection Clutter (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Issue chas-01 aboutEachPrefix (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: [Fwd: RDF Issues] (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: [Fwd: RDF Issues] (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: [Issue needed] Re: Comments on RDF test cases (Monday, 24 March)
• Issue vass-02 property instances (Monday, 24 March)
• Issue vass-01 flat layering (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema (Monday, 24 March)
• Fwd: [cosubmission] Issue xmlsch-12 (Monday, 24 March)
• Issue qu-04 RDF/XML serialization (Friday, 21 March)
• Issue pfps-24 What is RDF Schema? (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Friday, 21 March)
• Fwd: pfps-18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary (Friday, 21 March)
• Fwd: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals (Thursday, 20 March)
• pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Issue rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Thursday, 13 March)
• Issues tex-01, tex-02, williams-02 Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Issues xmlsch-01,,12 Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Issue timbl-02 semantics of reification (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Issues timbl-01 bagid needed (Tuesday, 11 March)
• [closed] Re: Comments for WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Issue #pfps-14 Social Meaning (Saturday, 1 March)
• Issue #jsr188-01 Global Datatyping (Saturday, 1 March)
• [closed] Re: "sanction by" and other issues from: (Saturday, 1 March)
• Issue #pfps-23 sanctioned by? (Saturday, 1 March)
• Issue #pfps-22 reserved names in abstract syntax (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Saturday, 1 March)
• Issue #jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf (Saturday, 1 March)
• Issue #webont-01 rename rdf schema (Friday, 28 February)
• Issue #horrocks-01 semantics of rdfs:comment (Friday, 28 February)
• [closed] Re: Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages (Friday, 28 February)
• Issue #pfps-14 Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Friday, 28 February)
• Issue #macgregor-02 propositional attitudes (Friday, 28 February)
• Issue #macgregor-01 Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [new issue] Assertion and provenance (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Thursday, 27 February)
• [closed] Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS closure lemma / entailments from empty graph (Tuesday, 25 February)
• [closed] Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations (Tuesday, 25 February)
• [closed] Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Issue #pfps-17,18,19,20,21 Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• [closed] Re: RDF Semantics: another 11 comments (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Monday, 24 February)
• Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF? (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Monday, 24 February)
• Issue #jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf (Monday, 24 February)
• Issue #williams-02 s/URIref/IRI/ (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Monday, 24 February)
• Issue #williams-01 What is a node in an RDF graph? (Monday, 24 February)
• Issue #qu-03 ontology subset of rdfs (Thursday, 20 February)
• Issue #qu-02 rdfs:member functional? (Thursday, 20 February)
• Issue #hendler-01 literals in rdf:parseType="Collection" (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comments on RDF last call working drafts (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Issue #qu-01 Domain of rdfs:member (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• "sanction by" and other issues from: (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Issue #pfps-14 the meaning of RDF tokens (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: issue number requested: was: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 18 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Friday, 14 February)
• [closed] Re: two comments on RDF Schema spec (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Friday, 14 February)
• [closed] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ? (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: #danc-03 section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: #hodder-01 WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 6 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call documents (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Friday, 31 January)
• Issue reagle-02 exc-c14n throughout [was Re: Please review RDF Last Call] (Friday, 31 January)
• issue reagle-01 Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Friday, 31 January)
• RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Friday, 31 January)
• RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity (Thursday, 30 January)
• Please review RDF last call working drafts (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Issue pfps-11 Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• SCHEMA TODO: Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Issues danc-01 and danc-02 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: two comments on RDF Schema spec (Monday, 27 January)
• Issue jang-01: Re: RDFCore test case LC comment (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules (Monday, 27 January)
• pointers to datatype sections in RDFCore Last Call WD's (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: abstract class (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: other rdf:nodeID name thoughts (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Vocab serialization equivalences (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Thursday, 2 January)
• Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Thursday, 2 January)

Butler, Mark

• Issue JSR188-01 (Monday, 24 March)
• FW: Comments on RDF last call working drafts (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: Issue xmlsch-12 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Comments on RDF last call working drafts (Tuesday, 18 February)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents (Friday, 14 March)
• XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: pointers to datatype sections in RDFCore Last Call WD's (Wednesday, 29 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• [Fwd: RDF Issues] (Wednesday, 12 March)

Dan Brickley

• Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: language correction (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Some comments on RDF Schema as RDF/XML (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: What is RDF Schema? (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Comments for WD-rdf-schema-20030123 (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: PICS in RDF: bagid examples, please? (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: editorial suggestion for RDF Test Cases: wording re 'identical' (Saturday, 8 February)
• editorial suggestion for RDF Test Cases: wording re 'identical' (Saturday, 8 February)
• editorial/typo in WD-rdf-testcases-20030123, "in _the_ Charter of..." (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: two comments on RDF Schema spec (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 3 January)

Dan Connolly

• Re: [closed] danc-03 rdf/xml reification examples (Thursday, 13 March)
• rdfs:member for Collections and collection syntax? (Friday, 21 February)
• PICS in RDF: bagid examples, please? (Tuesday, 11 February)
• section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Friday, 31 January)
• misplaced paren in gloss of existential introduction (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Issue danc-02 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 28 January)
• 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' (Friday, 3 January)

Daniel \

• Re: [closed] krech-01 emptyPropertyElt ambiguity (Thursday, 20 March)
• An rdfs:Schema Class (Monday, 24 February)
• slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity (Tuesday, 28 January)

Daniel Lipkin

• RE: Issue rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes (Tuesday, 25 March)

Dave Beckett

• [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-09 (Thursday, 27 March)
• [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08 (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Unnecessary {x a List} triples considered a waste (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: [closed] hodder-01 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Tuesday, 25 March)
• [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 20 March)
• [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 20 March)
• [closed] jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf (Thursday, 20 March)
• [closed] krech-01 emptyPropertyElt ambiguity (Thursday, 20 March)
• [closed] hodder-01 (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Minor test case fix (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Comments for WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Comment on Test Cases (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Comment on Test Cases (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Comment on rdf:parseType="Collection" (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: `alternate' vs `alternative' (was Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: other rdf:nodeID name thoughts (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003 (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: parseType collection (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: parseType collection (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003 (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: rdf:nodeID and rdf:parseType="Collection" (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: contents of a Collection (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Vocab serialization equivalences (Tuesday, 7 January)

Dave Hodder

• [walter@natural-innovations.com: Re: [closed] hodder-01 (rdf-comments, link rel=)] (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] hodder-01 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] hodder-01 (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: `alternate' vs `alternative' (was Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML (Tuesday, 11 February)

David Fallside

• Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages (Friday, 21 February)

Efthymiou, Nick

• re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Monday, 10 March)

epromote@bbgm.co.uk

• Business Broadband (Wednesday, 12 February)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• slight change to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfmodel (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Wednesday, 12 February)

Erick Calder

• language correction (Thursday, 13 February)

feifei

• ×îÐÂÐÂÎÅ (Monday, 13 January)
• ÐÂÄêÐÂÎÅ (Thursday, 9 January)

Frank

• How to get 10,000 free hits per day. Make money for freeeee! (Monday, 3 March)

Frank Manola

• Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Monday, 17 March)
• [closed] danc-03 rdf/xml reification examples (Thursday, 13 March)
• [closed] pfps-17 namespace v vocabulary (Thursday, 13 March)
• [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: slight change to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfmodel (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Friday, 28 February)
• [closed] Re: Use of datatyping (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [closed] Re: RDF Primer: Minor typo in triples examples in section 2.3 & 4.4 (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [closed] Re: Comments for WD-rdf-primer-20030123 (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments for WD-rdf-primer-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDFS comments (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: Use of datatyping (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: slight change to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfmodel (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: issue number requested: was: Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Monday, 17 February)
• issue number requested: was: Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Monday, 17 February)
• issue number requested: was: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: RDF Primer: Minor typo in triples examples in section 2.3 & 4.4 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: contents of a Collection (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Sunday, 12 January)

Garret Wilson

• Re: other rdf:nodeID name thoughts (Sunday, 19 January)
• other rdf:nodeID name thoughts (Sunday, 19 January)
• Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Sunday, 12 January)
• rdf:nodeID and rdf:parseType="Collection" (Sunday, 12 January)
• contents of a Collection (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: Confusion about Collections (Sunday, 12 January)
• name of rdf:nodeID attribute (Sunday, 12 January)

Graham Klyne

• [closed] macgregor-01, Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: [Fwd: RDF Issues] (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Friday, 14 March)
• [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Friday, 14 March)
• [Closed] RE: The FragId issue (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: The FragId issue (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [new issue] Assertion and provenance (Friday, 28 February)
• Impact of formal semantics on informal meanings (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments for WD-rdf-concepts-20030123 (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: concepts doc: 404s aren't meaningful? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: The FragId issue (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [RDF-Concepts:109] What is the expressive power of RDF? (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Friday, 21 February)
• [concepts] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Friday, 21 February)
• [RDF-Concepts:111-Various] RDF core, database example, soc-entailment (Wednesday, 19 February)
• [RDF-Concepts:109] What is the expressive power of RDF? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• [RDF-Concepts:pfps-15] Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Tuesday, 18 February)
• [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities? (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: parseType collection (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 3 January)

herman.ter.horst@philips.com

• Re: RDF Semantics: datatype entailments (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RDF Semantics review: RDFS closure lemma / entailments from empty graph (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics: another 11 comments (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics: datatype entailments (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics: subinterpretations (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics: 11 comments (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT (Friday, 21 February)
• RDF graph equality (Thursday, 6 February)

Ian Horrocks

• Comment on RDF comment (Thursday, 20 February)

J.R. van Ossenbruggen

• typo in appendix C of RDF Semantics (Saturday, 15 February)

Jan Grant

• [Issue needed] Re: Comments on RDF test cases (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Comments on RDF test cases (Friday, 21 March)
• [closed] Re: Comments for WD-rdf-testcases-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comment on Test Cases (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comment on Test Cases (Thursday, 20 February)
• [closed] Re: editorial/typo in WD-rdf-testcases-20030123, "in _the_ Charter of..." (Friday, 14 February)
• [closed] Re: RDFCore test case LC comment (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: language tags in typed RDF literals (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: editorial suggestion for RDF Test Cases: wording re 'identical' (Saturday, 8 February)
• [closed] Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases (Tuesday, 28 January)
• RDFCore test case LC comment (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 10 January)

Jan Wielemaker

• Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003 (Monday, 13 January)
• Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003 (Monday, 13 January)

Jeff Z Pan

• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Saturday, 15 February)

Jeff Z. Pan

• Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Thursday, 20 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• [closed] danc-01 "graph equality" (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: [closed] jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 10 March)
• [Fwd: RDF Concepts - section 4] (Friday, 7 March)
• RDF Concepts - section 4 (Friday, 7 March)
• Undefined terms in RDFS namespace (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Comment on Test Cases (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Comment on Test Cases (Friday, 21 February)
• Comment on Test Cases (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Issue danc-02 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Comment on RDF Test Cases (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Please review RDF Last Call (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Please review RDF Last Call documents (Tuesday, 28 January)

Jim Hendler

• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection (Thursday, 27 March)
• Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comment on rdf:parseType="Collection" (Thursday, 20 February)
• Comment on rdf:parseType="Collection" (Thursday, 20 February)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: Form Post From Mozilla (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)

Joseph Reagle

• Confusion about wrapping of XMLLiteral (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Tuesday, 28 January)

Karsten Tolle

• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 February)
• Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (Thursday, 20 February)

Marc Carrion

• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: abstract class (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 23 January)
• abstract class (Thursday, 23 January)

Marie Montoya

• Re: New Credit File Waiting! (Friday, 10 January)

Martin Duerst

• Re: Please review RDF Last Call documents (Monday, 3 February)
• URis -> URIs (Thursday, 30 January)

Massimo Marchiori

• RE: The FragId issue (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: The FragId issue (Saturday, 1 March)
• The FragId issue (Friday, 21 February)
• Issue of support of Bag/Alt in RDF (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Monday, 3 February)
• RE: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores (Friday, 10 January)

Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM

• Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08 (Tuesday, 1 April)

Olivier Corby

• XMLLiteral (Friday, 7 February)

Ossi Nykänen

• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Monday, 3 February)
• RDF LCWGs comments: RDF core, database example, soc-entailment and typo (Friday, 31 January)

pat hayes

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion). (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Comments for WD-rdf-mt-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: datatype entailments (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS closure lemma / entailments from empty graph (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: another 11 comments (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: RDF Semantics: 11 comments (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Some comments on the spec of RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: typo in appendix C of RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• language tags in typed RDF literals (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: XMLLiteral (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: abstract class (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Wednesday, 5 February)
• RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: Please review RDF Last Call (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ??? (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning XML Schema datatypes (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning the translation into Lbase (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDFS closure rules (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed XML Literals and LV (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals with language tags (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning untyped literals (Sunday, 26 January)
• Re: Semantics issues (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores (Friday, 10 January)

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 18 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Tuesday, 18 February)
• RE: language tags in typed RDF literals (Wednesday, 12 February)
• RE: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Friday, 31 January)
• RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Friday, 31 January)
• RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Thursday, 30 January)
• RE: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Thursday, 30 January)
• Request for comments on last call candidate drafts of RDF specification (Friday, 24 January)
• Request for comments on last call candidate drafts of RDF specification (Friday, 24 January)
• RE: Semantics issues (Friday, 24 January)
• RE: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Monday, 13 January)

Pete Johnston

• RDF Schema: typo in description of rdfs:domain of rdfs:comment? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RDF Primer: Minor typo in triples examples in section 2.3 & 4.4 (Tuesday, 4 February)
• RE: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Friday, 31 January)

Peter Crowther

• RE: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Monday, 17 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• domains and ranges in RDFS semantics (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype? (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: [closed] pfps-17 namespace v vocabulary (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [RDF-Concepts:109] What is the expressive power of RDF? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: issue number requested: was: Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: issue number requested: was: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: the meaning of RDF tokens (Monday, 17 February)
• questionable statement in RDF semantics (Friday, 7 February)
• error in Semantics document (Friday, 7 February)
• error in Semantics document (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Social Meaning and RDF (Wednesday, 5 February)
• the meaning of RDF tokens (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Can RDF say anything about anything? (Friday, 31 January)
• rdf graphs in RDF Semantics (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Thursday, 30 January)
• What is the expressive power of RDF? (Thursday, 30 January)
• What is an RDF datatype? (Thursday, 30 January)
• What does RDF consider a namespace to be? (Thursday, 30 January)
• What is RDF Schema? (Thursday, 30 January)
• Can RDF say anything about anything? (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals (Monday, 27 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning XML Schema datatypes (Saturday, 25 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning the translation into Lbase (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDFS closure rules (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed XML Literals and LV (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals with language tags (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes (Friday, 24 January)
• Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning untyped literals (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Semantics issues (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: Semantics issues (Tuesday, 21 January)
• problems with RDF datatyping (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Friday, 10 January)
• parseType collection (Friday, 10 January)
• problems with RDF literals (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' (Friday, 3 January)
• status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files'' (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002 (Thursday, 2 January)

Qu Yuzhong

• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Tuesday, 18 February)
• About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects (Saturday, 15 February)
• Some comments on the spec of RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Some comments on RDF Schema as RDF/XML (Tuesday, 11 February)

Richard H. McCullough

• automatic reification -- was ([jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores) (Friday, 10 January)

Roland Schwaenzl

• Use of datatyping (Tuesday, 18 February)

Sandy Nicholson

• `alternate' vs `alternative' (was Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Seth Russell

• Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion). (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion). (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ? (Thursday, 13 February)
• Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Social Meaning and RDF (Thursday, 6 February)

Susan Lesch

• Comments for WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123 (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments for WD-rdf-mt-20030123 (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Comments for WD-rdf-schema-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Comments for WD-rdf-testcases-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Comments for WD-rdf-primer-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Comments for WD-rdf-concepts-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Comments for WD-rdf-mt-20030123 (Monday, 24 February)
• Comments for RDF series Last Call Working Drafts (Monday, 24 February)

Tex Texin

• RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments (Friday, 28 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Unnecessary {x a List} triples considered a waste (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Form Post From Mozilla (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Two questions about bagid (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Two questions about bagid (Tuesday, 11 February)

Vassilis Christophides

• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Friday, 21 March)
• FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call (Monday, 17 February)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Monday, 24 February)
• Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" (Wednesday, 12 February)

Yuzhong Qu

• Re: Issue qu-04 RDF/XML serialization (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF? (Saturday, 1 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2003 22:00:50 UTC