W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 12:56:04 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030103125543.02cf5480@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org


At 06:54 03/01/2003 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:

>Promising direction, though I'm not sure what an "RDF resource" is. I usually
>read the "RDF" as redundant, and "resource" as synonym for "thing". Are there
>anythings (people, places, yadda) which aren't "RDF resources"?

I dropped the redundant 'RDF''s.

Brian

Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 07:54:45 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "problems with RDF literals"
Previous message: Brian McBride: "Re: Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002"
In reply to: Dan Brickley: "Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002"
Next in thread: Dave Beckett: "Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:15 GMT