[closed] krech-01 emptyPropertyElt ambiguity

Daniel

You made a last call comment "slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity"
captured in

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#krech-01

The RDFCore WG has resolved

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html

to accept this.

Details:

1. The test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007 was
   erronenously recorded as a negative test by the working group.

2. We will change:
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf
   to make rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 a test:PositiveParserTest

3. We will return rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 to the original version
   version that stated this as a positive.  This means changing
   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
   FROM:
     rdf:bagID is forbidden on property element prop with an rdf:resource or
     rdf:parseType attribute: the following is in error.
   TO:
     bagID on empty property element construction, with rdf:resource.

4. We note that the working draft section
     http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt
   consequently does not need to be changed.

This is recorded in the RDF/XML Syntax Editors Draft change list as
syntaxLCC-003

Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating 
whether this decision is acceptable.

Dave