- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:55:23 +0000
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
just marking this comment closed in the subject line. At 18:37 20/02/2003 -0800, David Fallside wrote: >The XMLP WG has approved the response below. >On behalf of the XMLP WG. > >............................................ >David C. Fallside >Chair XMLP WG >Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 > >----- Forwarded by David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM on 02/20/2003 06:35 PM >----- >|---------+----------------------------------> >| | Jacek Kopecky | >| | <jacek@systinet.com> | >| | Sent by: | >| | w3c-xml-protocol-wg-req| >| | uest@w3.org | >| | | >| | | >| | 02/11/2003 11:43 AM | >| | | >|---------+----------------------------------> > > >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | > | > | To: XMLP WG Private List > <w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org> > | > | cc: > | > | Subject: DRAFT Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in > SOAP messages | > | > | > > >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > > > >Below is the DRAFT of our response to RDF Core on whether SOAP can >transport RDF data. Is this what was meant by the action item? Do you >think it's sufficient? Who should I sent this to? > > >Dear RDF Core WG, > >as per our issue #29 [1] resolution [2] we believe that RDF data can be >transferred as payload in SOAP 1.2 messages (in headers or body) with no >problems, for example by serializing it using RDF/XML syntax. > >On behalf of the XMLP WG, > > Jacek Kopecky > > Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation > http://www.systinet.com/ > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x29 >[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Apr/0012.html
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 16:54:25 UTC