- From: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:46:00 -0800
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
I earlier complained of having rdf:nodeID without a separate
rdf:nodeIDRef. I'm now trying to use rdf:nodeID with
rdf:parseType="Collection".
The primer contains (I'll ignore rdf:resource versus rdf:about for
now---see my separate message):
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.edu/courses/6.001">
<s:students rdf:parseType="Collection" >
<s:student rdf:resource="http://example.edu/students/Amy"/>
<s:student rdf:resource="http://example.edu/students/Tim"/>
<s:student rdf:resource="http://example.edu/students/John"/>
</s:students>
</rdf:Description>
But what if the original description of each student is a blank node
identified by a nodeID? Can I do this?
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.edu/courses/6.001">
<s:students rdf:parseType="Collection" >
<s:student rdf:nodeID="amy"/>
<s:student rdf:nodeID="tim"/>
<s:student rdf:nodeID="john"/>
</s:students>
</rdf:Description>
And then what if I don't want them typed? Can I do this?
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.edu/courses/6.001">
<s:students rdf:parseType="Collection" >
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeID="amy"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeID="tim"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeID="john"/>
</s:students>
</rdf:Description>
My earlier question of whether this is rdf:about or rdf:resource brings
up my other earlier comment relating to the name of rdf:nodeID---I think
this should really be:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.edu/courses/6.001">
<s:students rdf:parseType="Collection" >
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeIDRef="amy"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeIDRef="tim"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeIDRef="john"/>
</s:students>
</rdf:Description>
Garret
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2003 13:32:23 UTC