W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:19:35 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030127111735.03ebada0@localhost>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Guys,

Is there a good reason to cross post here? We've got a disciplined process 
(I hope) for handling traffic on rdf-comments.  We have a different process 
for rdfcore.  If you post to both, its not clear what rules apply.

These look like last call comments to me and should be on rdf-comments.

Brian

At 11:37 26/01/2003 -0700, pat hayes wrote:

>>The closure rules for RDF are incomplete.  There are XML documents
>>without an enclosing language tag that have the same canonical form as
>>XML documents with and enclosing language tag.
>
>Indeed? I confess I was unaware of this. Indeed, the rules need to be 
>re-stated to accommodate this possibility, by merging rdf2a and 2b into 
>one rule.
>
>This (or something logically equivalent) will be done.
>
>Pat
>
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>IHMC                                    (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
>40 South Alcaniz St.                    (850)202 4416   office
>Pensacola                               (850)202 4440   fax
>FL 32501                                        (850)291 0667    cell
>phayes@ai.uwf.edu                 http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
>s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 08:51:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT