W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Issue #macgregor-01 Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:37:08 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030228143609.09e5b800@localhost>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
Cc: fmanola@mitre.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org


>
>
>I think your concerns can be expressed thus:
>
>1. The Concepts document is not clear that RDF does not define a mechanism 
>for distinguishing asserted and non-asserted forms.

changing the subject line

Brian


>2. The informal example in section 4.1 can be read as suggesting RDF 
>defined means to express propositional attitudes.  We should be clear that 
>propositional attitudes are not supported.
>
>You also raise an issue of provenance, but I don't think that impacts the 
>Concepts document.
>
>(You also note RDF's lack of a mechanism to refer to a graph;  by my 
>recollection, this idea, or something very like it, was discussed but 
>considered out of scope for the current WG effort, and has been noted as 
>an issue for possible future consideration.  I don't think there's 
>anything else we should say in our documents.)
>
>If this adequately captures your concerns, I'll ask Brian to raise an 
>issue for this, so the WG can consider your comments and get back to you.
>
>#g
>--
>
>>The second issue is the question of unasserted forms/statements.
>>
>>I am unable to find an RDF example of how to represent
>>a statement of belief (a propositional attitude).  Neither can
>>I find an example showing exactly what is meant by an
>>unasserted RDF statement. (If there are examples, they are not
>>identified as such.  Or I somehow missed them).
>>
>>These are what I referred to as unanwered issues.  I'm hoping that
>>someone will tell me what the "official" position is.
>>My last e-mail summarized my position
>>as to these two issues, so I won't go any deeper here.
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 09:36:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT