Re: Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema

Recorded as:

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-25

Brian

At 10:37 21/03/2003 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>You raise a last call review comment on RDF Schema (and RDF Semantics) in
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0124.html
>
>...noting that there are apparent divergences between these two
>specifications. Thanks for the careful comparision of our documents. To help
>us track this, I believe we should open an issue on
>'schema/semantics divergence' to keep track of this.
>
>Brian, could you open an issue please, unless there is another existing
>issue under which the comments in
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0124.html 
>could be filed.
>
>I also note editorially that the language in Schema that says
>'_the_ rdfs:range of ...' may be contentious, since there may well turn out
>  to be other true 'range' assertions about our properties (perhaps
>asserted by other working groups). Maybe OWL(Full?) already does this?
>Perhaps we should take more care to write 'an rdfs:range ...' instead of
>'the rdfs:range ...'.
>
>
>Thanks again for your comments,
>
>Dan