W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Two questions about bagid

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:34:55 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030214133136.030cc4a8@localhost>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>

At 11:43 12/02/2003 -0800, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:

[...]


>What is not clear is the use of going with the de-re interpretation.
>Whatever i  identifies, I don't know what the semantics are of a statement 
>which involves i.  There don't seem to be any use cases either.


Dear Developer,

This is the process policeman again.

I think the second question you have raised in this thread concerns the 
semantics of reification.  There has been some discussion and I'd like to 
clarify whether this discussion has satisfied your concerns or whether we 
should get a clear statement of the issue to go on the WG's last call 
comments list.

Brian
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 08:33:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT