W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Issue #pfps-14 the meaning of RDF tokens

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:02:08 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030218140129.036ca3c0@localhost>
To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

oops - forgot to change subject line.

Brian

At 13:20 18/02/2003 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>At 11:04 17/02/2003 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
>
>>Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>
>>>From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
>>>Subject: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
>>>Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:10:33 -0500
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>Only one last-call comment identifier is needed here, I think.  However, I
>>>>>do not see any in the last-call comment list at
>>>>>         http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues
>>>>You won't see it there.  There are two sets of change identifiers.  The 
>>>>ones listed at the URL you've cited are issues that have been referred 
>>>>by the Editors of the relevant documents to the WG for decision.  In 
>>>>addition, each Editor is maintaining an internal set of change 
>>>>identifiers for those changes they have accepted (as I have this one) 
>>>>and are going to go ahead and fix.
>>>>
>>>>--Frank
>>>You mean without input from the rest of the working group, or even
>>>elevating it to an official comment?
>>>I am distinctly unhappy with this way of dealing with my comments.
>>
>>
>>Peter--
>>
>>Your original comment was addressed to the Primer, and I've been dealing 
>>with it on that basis.  That didn't make it any less "official", it just 
>>meant I could decide myself whether I thought I could make the changes 
>>necessary to the Primer to deal with it.  I'll be happy to raise it as a 
>>general issue to be addressed in all the documents if you like (and in 
>>fact will do so now).
>>
>>Brian, can we have an issue number for this please?
>
>I have recorded comment
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-14
>
>The WG will consider this comment and get back to you.
>
>Brian
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 09:00:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT