- From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:37:12 -0800
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
The XMLP WG has approved the response below.
On behalf of the XMLP WG.
............................................
David C. Fallside
Chair XMLP WG
Ext Ph: 530.477.7169
----- Forwarded by David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM on 02/20/2003 06:35 PM
-----
|---------+---------------------------------->
| | Jacek Kopecky |
| | <jacek@systinet.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | w3c-xml-protocol-wg-req|
| | uest@w3.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 02/11/2003 11:43 AM |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: XMLP WG Private List <w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org> |
| cc: |
| Subject: DRAFT Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages |
| |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Below is the DRAFT of our response to RDF Core on whether SOAP can
transport RDF data. Is this what was meant by the action item? Do you
think it's sufficient? Who should I sent this to?
Dear RDF Core WG,
as per our issue #29 [1] resolution [2] we believe that RDF data can be
transferred as payload in SOAP 1.2 messages (in headers or body) with no
problems, for example by serializing it using RDF/XML syntax.
On behalf of the XMLP WG,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x29
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Apr/0012.html
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:41:47 UTC