W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: [closed] krech-01 emptyPropertyElt ambiguity

From: Daniel \ <eikeon@eikeon.com>
Date: 20 Mar 2003 17:30:35 -0500
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: "www-rdf-comments@w3.org" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1048199435.4149.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 17:03, Dave Beckett wrote:
> Daniel
> 
> You made a last call comment "slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity"
> captured in
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#krech-01
> 
> The RDFCore WG has resolved
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
> 
> to accept this.
> 
> Details:
> 
> 1. The test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007 was
>    erronenously recorded as a negative test by the working group.
> 
> 2. We will change:
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf
>    to make rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 a test:PositiveParserTest
> 
> 3. We will return rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 to the original version
>    version that stated this as a positive.  This means changing
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
>    FROM:
>      rdf:bagID is forbidden on property element prop with an rdf:resource or
>      rdf:parseType attribute: the following is in error.
>    TO:
>      bagID on empty property element construction, with rdf:resource.
> 
> 4. We note that the working draft section
>      http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt
>    consequently does not need to be changed.
> 
> This is recorded in the RDF/XML Syntax Editors Draft change list as
> syntaxLCC-003
> 
> Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating 
> whether this decision is acceptable.

Yes, the decision is acceptable.


> Dave
-- 
Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/

Redfoot.net, http://redfoot.net/
RDFLib.net, http://rdflib.net/
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 17:29:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT