W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:42:41 +0100
To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <hendler@cs.umd.edu>

WG: co-ordination:

Brian either:
- raise new issue for wowg 'literals in parsetype="Collection"', or add link
to wowg from issue hendler-01


- raise new issue for wowg 'rdf:XMLLiteral' ambiguous or add link to wowg
from issue reagle-01 (including link to test cases, assuming Jim agrees
their relevance)


Hi Jim

I am still not quite sure of the RDF Core process for handling e-mails that
span our docs.

I will discuss only the issues you raise under "WOWG comments on RDF
language decisions". I hope other editors will further other issues.

> i. Design of rdf:XMLLiteral and rdf:parseType="Literal":

This seems to be a duplicate of the issue


XMLLiteral equality.
We may assign a new issue ID or treat it under that one.

Please could you confirm that:
contains two relevant test cases that you would like RDF Core to consider.

> ii.Constraints on rdf:parsetype="Collection"

Appears to be an endorsement of

if so, we may issue a new ID or treat it under the ID hendler-01.

Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 08:42:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:20 UTC