W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:51:01 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Er, this particular original comment was with respect the vocabulary 
draft.  I can't see anything in Concepts that is affected here:

Vocabulary terms in the rdf: namespace are listed in section 5.1 of the RDF 
syntax specification [RDF-SYNTAX].

Vocabulary terms defined in the rdfs: namespace are defined in the RDF 
schema vocabulary specification [RDF-VOCABULARY].

By WG consent, the Concepts document does not list rdf: or rdfs: vocabulary 


(I'm slowly catching up a big backlog of work;  I've noted the other 
comments but am not yet ready to consider them in depth.)


At 02:21 PM 1/2/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>Graham, Jeremy,
>I'm suggesting this is one for you guys.
>> > [[The RDF specifications define the following classes.]]
>> >
>> > >  The Concepts document claims otherwise.
>> > >What does it mean that the core RDF specifications define a class?  What
>> > >does it mean for a thing to be described by RDF?
>> >
>> > I really have no idea what you are getting at here.  Is there some more
>> > specific way you can make this comment?
>>Concepts states that
>>         Vocabulary terms in the rdf: namespace are defined in section 5.1
>>         of the RDF syntax specification.
>>but you include several terms form the rdf: namespace in your list.
>I think we mean here that the names in the namespace are defined in syntax 
>5.1 (which I'm feeling is the wrong place, but it'll do), not that they 
>are 'defined' in the syntax doc.
>What do you think?

Graham Klyne
Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 06:54:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:19 UTC