W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:37:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030314.073734.68533498.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: gk@ninebynine.org
Cc: Peter.Crowther@networkinference.com, bparsia@isis.unc.edu, hendler@cs.umd.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Subject: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:57:31 +0000

> Subject: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
> You raised made a last call comment [pfps-14] captured in:
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-14
> The RDFCore WG has resolved:
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
> to accept this comment,
> by removing the section on social meaning from the Concepts document,
> per WG proposal:
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0029.html
> Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
> whether this decision is acceptable.

Hmm.  I don't view this as a comprehensive response to my comments on this

I particular my message referenced in the issue list doesn't even mention
the section on social meaning.

I await identification of other changes that may be done in response to
this comment.

> Thank you for your attention,
> #g

Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 07:38:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:20 UTC